Specific to Briscoes vs. PBK? Because Lee is LEAVING THE COMPANY so why the hell wouldn't you have him put someone over on his way out?BurningHammer wrote:Why are these booking decisions bad, to me they make sense and actually promote and help story lines/characters running through shows, the fact is just attacking him after the match is just bullshit samey booking as the other stuff you are being annoyed about. These types of booking just satisfy everyone involved. You seems to think wrestlers aren't the ones being a problem here and it's just Delirious.Big Red Machine wrote:What in the hell was the purpose of booking Briscoes vs. PBK to go to a no-contest?
Hell... we had six matches on that show that were announced in advance, and of those we had one no-contest and one f*cking distraction finish. Can we please stop it with this stupid bullsh*t dirty booking? Like.. does Delirious really think that in 2017 people are going to be outraged that Cole distracted Daniels and caused him to lose a wrestling match and thus will buy the PPV? COME ON! Just let the #1 contender beat the jobbers with the terrible name and have Cole attack him after the match or something if you want to do an angle.
As for the general complaint: because ROH was built on clean finishes. That's that the "Honor" in "Ring of Honor" means. There differences between having Cole cause Daniels to lose via distraction and having Daniels win and then Cole attacking him after the match:
1. Daniels, the #1 contender, wins his match
2. We get a clean finish
3. I don't know about you, but for me, there is a lot more heat in assaulting a man who has just wrestled a match than there is in showing up and not touching him, and him losing because he got distracted.
As for me assuming that Delirious is the problem and not the wrestlers: HE'S THE BOOKER. It's his job to determine the finishes.