ROHWorld.com Forum

supersonic wrote:http://voicesofwrestling.com/forum/view ... 510#p28851

Joe Lanza wrote:I'm starting to smell a rat with Cody Rhodes.

DO NOT CLICK ON LINK BELOW UNLESS YOU'RE ON A PRIVATE COMPUTER AND HAVE POP-UP BLOCKERS. YOU WILL STILL SEE SMUT ADS SINCE DAVE SCHERER AND MIKE JOHNSON ARE SCUMBAG MOTHERFUCKERS.

http://www.pwinsider.com/article/102916 ... s.html?p=1

Mike Johnson wrote:Interesting to note that we've heard there's been communication over the last few days between WWE and Cody Rhodes, who just departed the company. From what we can ascertain, there's been discussion about the company signing him to some sort of deal similar to their Legends deal, which would allow the company to release merchandise, etc. using his likeness. It may be that they had Stardust, etc. material coming out from a third-party (a Mattel action figure, for example) and offered him a deal so legally, they can move forward with that. There's been no talk of Rhodes returning as a full-time performer as he's seeking to work specific, big matches on the independent level and we've heard he's already being represented in Hollywood for potential acting world.

Mark Carrano called Cody Runnels for a legends deal. At this point no agreement has been reached but Runnels wasn’t happy because the conversation was supposed to be confidential, and the next thing you know, there were reports Rhodes had called WWE trying to return

supersonic wrote:You posted that in the wrong thread and I already beat you to it as well.

supersonic wrote:Observer:

Mark Carrano called Cody Runnels for a legends deal. At this point no agreement has been reached but Runnels wasn’t happy because the conversation was supposed to be confidential, and the next thing you know, there were reports Rhodes had called WWE trying to return

More to this that I'm hoping gets broken on the Voices of Wrestling podcast.

ceftaxias wrote:will never get the whole "i'm personally offended because someone knows something" deal

TYFDK wrote:I'm not offended, I'm annoyed that you're posting these non-news items and treating them like they're something we should understand.

When it's actual news, sure, post whatever you want or whatever your insiders are telling you. But with what this Rhodes deal is, as of right now, it's nothing.

But you're right. It is silly to be upset about, it's only wrestling after all, and you can do whatever you're allowed to do if you'd like. I just personally would prefer actual things instead of vague things.

TYFDK wrote:This vague bullshit posting here isn't as bad as rovert's posting of his own vague Twitter posts on the SA forums, but this is still pretty bad.

monster mafia wrote:

TYFDK wrote:I'm not offended, I'm annoyed that you're posting these non-news items and treating them like they're something we should understand.

When it's actual news, sure, post whatever you want or whatever your insiders are telling you. But with what this Rhodes deal is, as of right now, it's nothing.

But you're right. It is silly to be upset about, it's only wrestling after all, and you can do whatever you're allowed to do if you'd like. I just personally would prefer actual things instead of vague things.

x2

Joe then delves into the seedy world of rumors and scoopz, as he takes a look at the in flux situation of several potential WWE signings. The list: Roderick Strong, Zack Sabre Jr, Johnny Gargano, Moose, and Ricochet. Finally, the curious case of Cody Rhodes’ release is broken down. Joe explains how there is way more beneath the surface than meets the eye.

and doesn’t have any [indy] bookings beyond October [2016] right now.