Consensus on Red?

GardenStateSaint · Post by **GardenStateSaint** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:03 am

So after the 10th Anniversary show I was wondering what the general consensus is on Amazing Red? Does he still offer something to the current ROH roster?

Marketh. · Post by **Marketh.** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:08 am

Yes, the roster could use a highflyer. Think of the potentially great matches with TJ, Steen, Generico, Edwards, Elgin and Jay Briscoe.

187_Joeism · Post by **187_Joeism** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:09 am

He´s no longer the 2002 amazing Red with new moves that nobody ever saw but he still useful to the roster. Teaming with TJP and having singles matches here and there is the perfect spot from him right now in ROH

WonkaStar · Post by **WonkaStar** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:09 am

Have yet to watch 10th Anniversary but the last few matches I saw of him didnt seem like he was giving it his all. I hope he did in this match because if so I would love to see him be on the shows more regularly.

Post by **ROHWorld_Steven** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:12 am

I enjoyed him at the 10th Anniversary but I'm not sure if I'd want him brought in full-time as a singles guy. As a team with TJP would be great but I think he could get boring quickly on his own.

Post by **ROHFanAnthony** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:35 am

I wouldn't mind if Red wrestled another match or two for ROH.

astoph · Post by **astoph** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:57 am

SteenMark23 · Post by **SteenMark23** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:24 am

YES. Bringing in Amazing Red will be a big step in the right direction. He pretty much stole the show at 10YA, and to not sign him afetr that would be pretty lousy. Red would be a great addition to the roster and would be something different. He's still young, still great, and can put on great matches with just about anyone on the roster. Putting him with TJP as a team would be great too.

GardenStateSaint · Post by **GardenStateSaint** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:23 am

SteenMark23 wrote:He pretty much stole the show at 10YA

Adam Cole would like to have a word with you.

WrestlingMatters · Post by **WrestlingMatters** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:34 am

On a part time basis, he'd be fine I guess.

DanielBryanson · Post by **DanielBryanson** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:37 am

astoph wrote:Meh.

This.

JigsawVs.Jason · Post by **JigsawVs.Jason** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:39 pm

YES!!! Red was awesome at the 10th Anniversary show!!! And the fact the current roster is extremely thin, this should be a no-brainer! Just like Whitmer BTW

D2Kvirus · Post by **D2Kvirus** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:43 pm

ROH needs a high flier, and if red is motivated he'll fit in fine.

2 Gatz · Post by **2 Gatz** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:35 pm

I'd like to see him back on the roster, whether it be teaming with TJP or as a singles guy.

adam08 · Post by **adam08** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:39 pm

Yes I wanted him back full time when I heard he was announced for 10 anniversary show.

WrestlingMatters · Post by **WrestlingMatters** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:45 pm

JigsawVs.Jason wrote:YES!!! Red was awesome at the 10th Anniversary show!!! And the fact the current roster is extremely thin, this should be a no-brainer! Just like Whitmer BTW

100% on Whitmer, he's better than ever right now.

GardenStateSaint · Post by **GardenStateSaint** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:52 pm

D2Kvirus wrote:ROH needs a high flier, and if red is motivated he'll fit in fine.

Am I remembering this wrong but wasn't ROH hyping a high flyer in the fall/early winter?

Nice Guy Eddie · Post by **Nice Guy Eddie** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:27 pm

I'm all for Red on a full time basis. I also feel ROH needs another high flyer. I always enjoyed when Jack Evans was around. Probably my favorite high flyer.

D2Kvirus · Post by **D2Kvirus** » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:25 am

GardenStateSaint wrote:
D2Kvirus wrote:ROH needs a high flier, and if red is motivated he'll fit in fine.
Am I remembering this wrong but wasn't ROH hyping a high flyer in the fall/early winter?

Wasn't that Perkins?

WrestlingMatters · Post by **WrestlingMatters** » Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:53 am

D2Kvirus wrote:Wasn't that Perkins?

No.

Consensus on Red?

Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?

Re: Consensus on Red?