It's only free if you think signing up to RoH Ringside membership is worth whatever they're charging. My other concern would be that if you get it for 'free', they're going to be even less bothered if they screw up the feed again.

supersonic wrote:

taxidriver77 wrote:I've always said Cole reminds me of a young Jerry Lynn.

Cole has charisma and cuts excellent promos though.

I was joking about the Hardy Cole storyline.

Makes sence to bring in another tag-team and could make the difference with the Young Bucks re-signing They're tweeting counting down the days until they're free agents so I don't think that's promising. RoH keeping wrestlers on contracts that greatly restrict which bookings they can take but not u...

I havn't seen much of Chikara either. Do 3.0 where masks? No http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6sxdnmRcX1rt4k5qo9_250.jpg Does anybody know if BLK OUT will be appearing on a regular basis? What was the guy's name from BLK OUT who's also appeared in TNA recently? Depends on whether he's under TNA c...

I've always said Cole reminds me of a young Jerry Lynn.

KenSmellsGood wrote:Despite the WWE's pathetic treatment of the Daniel Bryan match, two superstars cut from the ROH cloth headlined the last Wrestlemania.

Rock and Cena?

They are in the spoiler thread.

The thing to put the Headbangers into context is that, considering their position on the card, heel status and the timing of when they came in, they're effectively RoH's replacement for the Young Bucks. It's a bit like if the decided Steen was too expensive to fly in and replaced him with Viscera.

RoH expecting fans to give a shit about the Headbangers reveal is just shocking.

The Briscoes def The Bravados Post match Guardians of Truth revealed themselves as The Headbangers. This might be worth watching for the wrong reasons as it's RoH's equivalent of the Gobbledygooker. Whoever thinks that booking the Headbangers, a mediocre and not very over team from the 90s, in RoH ...

Duke of Bridgewater wrote: And what would be this lesson anyway? "Indy wrestling on TV doesn't work."

There's not one particular style of Indy wrestling but if you take Indy as meaning RoH's style under Carey and Gabe, that's not what SBGRoH puts out.

They can't work TV (e.g. NWA Hollywood) and they can't work iPPV (occasional CZW and Chikara shows and all Gabe's stuff) as far as I'm aware.

Perhaps a mass exodus will change ROH's ways, if you love ROH the best way to support it is to stop supporting it. I don´t see how stop supporting will help ROH, it will hurt the company and the wrestlers. It might stop them taking long-time fans for granted and, as far as wrestlers go, they're ind...

Hagadorn's also terrible in the ring and I presume this is an angle to give Titus a partner against WGTT.

Grizzly, Hagadorn, Pelle, Bobby Demsey or Davey Andrews? Hopefully someone good on the mike as Rhet's singles promos are pretty bad.

I'd suggest PWG rather than DGUSA having watched both. They book the best RoH and DGUSA contracted wrestlers. It's where the money I'm not going to be spending on RoH iPPVs going.

They do in Sinclair's RoH business plan.

It wouldn''t do any harm telling them to avoid them blaming it on the wrestlers and booking more mainstream stars and globally-branded names.

Judging by what TJP said about Sinclair management I wouldn't presume that.

Captain44 wrote:I just don't get the appeal of Mondo.

Absolutely. He's okay in the ring with the right opponent and clearly works hard but there are about 30 odd Indy workers I'd rather watch.